2016 Chrysler 200
2016 Mazda6
Vehicle Comparison
2016 Chrysler 200
1842016 Mazda6
1842016 Chrysler 200
14 cu. ft.2016 Mazda6
16 cu. ft.2016 Chrysler 200
$22,9902016 Mazda6
$21,4952016 Chrysler 200
52016 Mazda6
52016 Chrysler 200 vs 2016 Mazda6
The 2016 Chrysler 200 and the 2016 Mazda6 are almost neck and neck. The question is which car provides convenience features like reactive front seat headrests, adjustable rear headrests and an electronic vehicle information center with all models?
Advantages of the 2016 Chrysler 200
Does size matter?
The 2016 Mazda6 is about half an inch wider than the 2016 Chrysler 200, but this somehow results in it having a passenger volume of only 99.7 cubic feet compared to the 101.4 cubic feet of the Chrysler. It is an inch shorter in length also cuts down on the amount of headroom in the front and rear, making the 2016 Chrysler 200 better suited for long trips where comfort is premium.
Which Lets Me Carry the Most?
Although these two vehicles are very closely matched, the 2016 Chrysler 200 wins when it comes to moving cargo around. Adventure seekers and others who spend a lot of time in their vehicles are certain to feel a bit more comfortable carrying gear with 16.0 cubic feet of MFR cargo volume as compared to the scant 14.8 cubic feet found in the 2016 Mazda6. The 2016 Chrysler 200 also has a higher gross vehicle weight rating of 4612 pounds, which could make it easier to load down.
Which Is the Most Convenient?
The 2016 Chrysler 200 backs up features like its cargo readiness and passenger-carrying capacity with standard tie downs in the cargo area and a standard delayed courtesy lighting. It also includes standard wireless communication access for Bluetooth devices and comes with a remote tailgate release by default. The Chrysler 200 provides the convenience features of reactive front seat headrests, adjustable rear headrests and an electronic vehicle information center with all models that are not provided in the Mazda6.
